This study introduces a new model of credibility for websites: graphical interfaces, functioning as bi-directional channels of communication that enable both users and computers to communicate. In the proposed model, website credibility is based on (i) Context of fruition: situational factors and internal characteristics of users, measured by level of involvement (Zaichkowsky, 1994); (ii) Stimuli: inputs that attract the attention of users as interpreted through their memory schemata. These enable users to generate prototypes – representative models of a particular membership category – and examples – imitative models of a membership category; and (iii) Mental schemata: unconscious cognitive representations, based on knowledge structures. These enable one to differentiate between users who are experts – individuals who possess these schemata – and those who are novices – individuals who do not (Guido, 2001). Results obtained from two experimental studies showed that credibility should not be considered an objective characteristic ascribed to its source, but a subjective one, deriving from users’ cognitive and motivational processes.

Prototypes versus examples: A new model of online credibility for commercial websites

GUIDO, Gianluigi;
2010-01-01

Abstract

This study introduces a new model of credibility for websites: graphical interfaces, functioning as bi-directional channels of communication that enable both users and computers to communicate. In the proposed model, website credibility is based on (i) Context of fruition: situational factors and internal characteristics of users, measured by level of involvement (Zaichkowsky, 1994); (ii) Stimuli: inputs that attract the attention of users as interpreted through their memory schemata. These enable users to generate prototypes – representative models of a particular membership category – and examples – imitative models of a membership category; and (iii) Mental schemata: unconscious cognitive representations, based on knowledge structures. These enable one to differentiate between users who are experts – individuals who possess these schemata – and those who are novices – individuals who do not (Guido, 2001). Results obtained from two experimental studies showed that credibility should not be considered an objective characteristic ascribed to its source, but a subjective one, deriving from users’ cognitive and motivational processes.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11587/407385
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact