Swirl-stabilized combustors are central to gas turbine technology, where the swirl number critically determines flow structure and combustion stability. This work systematically investigates the isothermal flow in a dual-swirl combustor, focusing on two primary objectives: evaluating advanced turbulence models and quantifying the impact of geometric-induced swirl number variations. Large Eddy Simulation (LES), Detached Eddy Simulation (DES), Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS), and the k- (Formula presented.) SST RANS model are compared against experimental data. The results suggest that while all models capture the mean recirculation zones, the scale-resolving approaches (LES, DES, SAS) more accurately predict the unsteady dynamics, such as shear layer fluctuations and the precessing vortex core, which are challenging for the RANS model. Furthermore, a parametric study of vane angles (60° to 70°) reveals a non-monotonic relationship between geometry and the resulting swirl number, attributed to internal flow separation. An intermediate swirl number range (S ≈ 0.79) was found to promote stable and coherent recirculation zones, whereas higher swirl numbers led to more intermittent flow structures. These findings may provide practical guidance for selecting turbulence models and optimizing swirler geometry in the design of modern combustors.
Quantifying Swirl Number Effects on Recirculation Zones and Vortex Dynamics in a Dual-Swirl Combustor
Ghazanfar Mehdi;Maria Grazia De Giorgi
2025-01-01
Abstract
Swirl-stabilized combustors are central to gas turbine technology, where the swirl number critically determines flow structure and combustion stability. This work systematically investigates the isothermal flow in a dual-swirl combustor, focusing on two primary objectives: evaluating advanced turbulence models and quantifying the impact of geometric-induced swirl number variations. Large Eddy Simulation (LES), Detached Eddy Simulation (DES), Scale-Adaptive Simulation (SAS), and the k- (Formula presented.) SST RANS model are compared against experimental data. The results suggest that while all models capture the mean recirculation zones, the scale-resolving approaches (LES, DES, SAS) more accurately predict the unsteady dynamics, such as shear layer fluctuations and the precessing vortex core, which are challenging for the RANS model. Furthermore, a parametric study of vane angles (60° to 70°) reveals a non-monotonic relationship between geometry and the resulting swirl number, attributed to internal flow separation. An intermediate swirl number range (S ≈ 0.79) was found to promote stable and coherent recirculation zones, whereas higher swirl numbers led to more intermittent flow structures. These findings may provide practical guidance for selecting turbulence models and optimizing swirler geometry in the design of modern combustors.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


