Throughout the history of Western thought, astrology has been viewed as either a dangerous or false science, or as a true and superior science or art, that can pro- vide practitioners with access to divine truth. However, a middle ground appears un- attainable. The article presents two opposing perspectives on astrology: Theodor W. Adorno’s contemporary view, which considers astrology as an instrument of power in consumer society, and Michael Scot’s scientific foundation of astrology developed during the Middle Ages in light of Arabic-Latin translations. The aim of the article is to show how Scotus’ epistemology establishes «the science of the stars» as the supreme science and places the human being and the study of the soul at the centre of the cosmos in the 4th distinction of the Liber introductorius, known as De anima.
Astrology as the «Queen of Sciences» in Michael Scot’s Liber introductorius
NAVARRA G
2024-01-01
Abstract
Throughout the history of Western thought, astrology has been viewed as either a dangerous or false science, or as a true and superior science or art, that can pro- vide practitioners with access to divine truth. However, a middle ground appears un- attainable. The article presents two opposing perspectives on astrology: Theodor W. Adorno’s contemporary view, which considers astrology as an instrument of power in consumer society, and Michael Scot’s scientific foundation of astrology developed during the Middle Ages in light of Arabic-Latin translations. The aim of the article is to show how Scotus’ epistemology establishes «the science of the stars» as the supreme science and places the human being and the study of the soul at the centre of the cosmos in the 4th distinction of the Liber introductorius, known as De anima.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
