Background: Despite the available evidence showing an association between cardiac arrhythmia and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), few studies have compared this risk between ICIs. Objectives: We aim to evaluate Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) of ICIs-induced cardiac arrhythmias and compare the reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias among ICIs. Methods: ICSRs were retrieved from the European Pharmacovigilance database (Eudravigilance). ICSRs were classified based on the ICI reported (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, durvalumab, ave-lumab, cemiplimab, and dostarlimab). If more than one ICI was reported, the ICSR was classified as a combi-nation of ICIs. ICSRs of ICI-related arrhythmias were described and the reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias was assessed by applying the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI). Results: A total of 1262 ICSRs were retrieved, of which 147 (11.65 %) were related to combinations of ICIs. A total of 1426 events of cardiac arrhythmias were identified. The three most reported events were atrial fibril-lation, tachycardia, and cardiac arrest. Ipilimumab was associated with a reduced reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias compared to all other ICIs (ROR 0.71, 95 %CI 0.55-0.92; p = 0.009). Anti-PD1 was associated with a higher reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias than anti-CTLA4 (ROR 1.47, 95 %CI 1.14-1.90; p = 0.003). Conclusion: This study is the first comparing ICIs for the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. We found that ipilimumab was the only ICI associated with a reduced reporting frequency. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm our results.
Do immune checkpoint inhibitors share the same pharmacological feature in the risk of cardiac arrhythmias?
Donniacuo, Maria;
2023-01-01
Abstract
Background: Despite the available evidence showing an association between cardiac arrhythmia and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), few studies have compared this risk between ICIs. Objectives: We aim to evaluate Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) of ICIs-induced cardiac arrhythmias and compare the reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias among ICIs. Methods: ICSRs were retrieved from the European Pharmacovigilance database (Eudravigilance). ICSRs were classified based on the ICI reported (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, ipilimumab, durvalumab, ave-lumab, cemiplimab, and dostarlimab). If more than one ICI was reported, the ICSR was classified as a combi-nation of ICIs. ICSRs of ICI-related arrhythmias were described and the reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias was assessed by applying the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI). Results: A total of 1262 ICSRs were retrieved, of which 147 (11.65 %) were related to combinations of ICIs. A total of 1426 events of cardiac arrhythmias were identified. The three most reported events were atrial fibril-lation, tachycardia, and cardiac arrest. Ipilimumab was associated with a reduced reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias compared to all other ICIs (ROR 0.71, 95 %CI 0.55-0.92; p = 0.009). Anti-PD1 was associated with a higher reporting frequency of cardiac arrhythmias than anti-CTLA4 (ROR 1.47, 95 %CI 1.14-1.90; p = 0.003). Conclusion: This study is the first comparing ICIs for the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. We found that ipilimumab was the only ICI associated with a reduced reporting frequency. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm our results.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.