The two species names were inverted on page 314 under Conculsions section. The sentence should read as: On the basis of the integrative taxonomy approach here presented, we formally propose to raise the two traditionally recognized colour morphotypes, D. luteocincta var. reticulata and D. luteocincta var. alba, to species rank as Diaphorodoris luteocincta and D. alba stat. nov. respectively.
Erratum: Diaphorodoris alba Portmann & Sandmeier, 1960 is a valid species: Molecular and morphological comparison with D. luteocincta (M. Sars, 1870) (Gastropoda: Nudibranchia) (Zootaxa (2016) 4193 (304-316))
Furfaro, Giulia
Primo
;
2016-01-01
Abstract
The two species names were inverted on page 314 under Conculsions section. The sentence should read as: On the basis of the integrative taxonomy approach here presented, we formally propose to raise the two traditionally recognized colour morphotypes, D. luteocincta var. reticulata and D. luteocincta var. alba, to species rank as Diaphorodoris luteocincta and D. alba stat. nov. respectively.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
