Objectives: To evaluate the effect of bladder flap formation (BFF) during caesarean section (CS) on the uterine scar, assessed during repeat CS. Studydesign: OnehundredandfifteenwomenundergoingtheirfirstCSweredividedintotwogroups:58 women had a CS with BFF (Group 1) and 57 women had a CS without BFF (Group 2). During the repeat CS, four specimens from the uterine scar from the first CS were collected from each woman, and evaluated by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: Adhesionswerefoundin28(48.3)womeninGroup1and14(24.1%)womeninGroup2(p<0.01). Of the women with adhesions in Group 1, 20 (71.4%) had mild adhesions and eight (28.6%) had severe adhesions. Of the women with adhesions in Group 2, eight (57.1%) had mild adhesions and six (42.9%) had severe adhesions. Light microscopy revealed significant differences in submesothelial fibrosis (39.6% vs 12.2%; p < 0.01) and neo-angiogenesis of the mesothelial stroma (46.5% vs 21%; p < 0.01) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. TEM revealed more specimens with inflammatory cells in Group 1 compared with Group 2 {mean 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 1.3] vs 18.2 (SD 1.9) patients; p < 0.01}. Conclusion: BFF during CS leads to an inflammatory and fibrotic reaction, resulting in inflammation reactive and regenerative processes, mesothelial hyperplasia and submesothelial fibrosis. CS without BFF reduces the inflammatory processes and the subsequent intraperitoneal adhesions and adhesions between the bladder and uterus.

The effect of avoiding bladder flap formation in cesarean section on the repeat cesarean delivery.

GUIDO, Marcello;
2011-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of bladder flap formation (BFF) during caesarean section (CS) on the uterine scar, assessed during repeat CS. Studydesign: OnehundredandfifteenwomenundergoingtheirfirstCSweredividedintotwogroups:58 women had a CS with BFF (Group 1) and 57 women had a CS without BFF (Group 2). During the repeat CS, four specimens from the uterine scar from the first CS were collected from each woman, and evaluated by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: Adhesionswerefoundin28(48.3)womeninGroup1and14(24.1%)womeninGroup2(p<0.01). Of the women with adhesions in Group 1, 20 (71.4%) had mild adhesions and eight (28.6%) had severe adhesions. Of the women with adhesions in Group 2, eight (57.1%) had mild adhesions and six (42.9%) had severe adhesions. Light microscopy revealed significant differences in submesothelial fibrosis (39.6% vs 12.2%; p < 0.01) and neo-angiogenesis of the mesothelial stroma (46.5% vs 21%; p < 0.01) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. TEM revealed more specimens with inflammatory cells in Group 1 compared with Group 2 {mean 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 1.3] vs 18.2 (SD 1.9) patients; p < 0.01}. Conclusion: BFF during CS leads to an inflammatory and fibrotic reaction, resulting in inflammation reactive and regenerative processes, mesothelial hyperplasia and submesothelial fibrosis. CS without BFF reduces the inflammatory processes and the subsequent intraperitoneal adhesions and adhesions between the bladder and uterus.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11587/362111
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact