This work presents a dialogic model of psychotherapy (the Two-Stage Semiotic Model, TSSM) with discourse flow analysis (DFA) and a low-inferential method of analysis based on it. TSSM claims that in good-outcome psychotherapy, the patient’s system of meanings follows a U-shaped trend: First, it decreases, and then the dialog promotes new meanings. DFA represents a session’s dialog as a "discourse network" made by the associations for temporal adjacency between contents; then it studies the network’s dynamic properties. DFA has been applied to the textual corpus obtained from the verbatim transcript of a 15-session psychotherapy course. Findings are consistent with the hypotheses.

Looking at the psychotherapy process as an intersubjective dynamic of meaning-making. A case study with Discourse Flow Analysis

Salvatore, Sergio;Gelo, Omar;Gennaro, Alessandro;Manzo, Stefano;Al Radaideh, Ahmed
2010-01-01

Abstract

This work presents a dialogic model of psychotherapy (the Two-Stage Semiotic Model, TSSM) with discourse flow analysis (DFA) and a low-inferential method of analysis based on it. TSSM claims that in good-outcome psychotherapy, the patient’s system of meanings follows a U-shaped trend: First, it decreases, and then the dialog promotes new meanings. DFA represents a session’s dialog as a "discourse network" made by the associations for temporal adjacency between contents; then it studies the network’s dynamic properties. DFA has been applied to the textual corpus obtained from the verbatim transcript of a 15-session psychotherapy course. Findings are consistent with the hypotheses.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
salvatore et al_JoCP2010.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione editoriale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 285.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
285.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11587/323564
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 51
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact