The problem of interface decohesion in laminated beams is addressed with reference to the debonding double cantilever beam test geometry (DCB). The paper deals with the analysis of the influence of nonuniform bonding properties or inter- facial defects on the crack propagation process and its stability. To this aim, the classical analytical approach based on the Euler–Bernoulli beam on an elastic foundation is extended to the presence of a general distribution of microcracks ahead of the macrocrack tip. The main features and limitations of this approach are carefully analyzed. In particular, it is shown that this simplified approach does not consider the unilateral contact condition along the interface, thus admitting a pen- etration between the two arms of the beam. A comparison with a finite element formulation is proposed to assess if this violation of the constraints inequalities, usually adopted in the case of uniform bonding, is still acceptable when interfacial defects are present. In order to fully describe the whole nonlinear behavior of the interface, a generalized interface consti- tutive law is used. The models comparison shows that, in the presence of interfacial defects, the effect of contact plays a crucial role in the description of the mechanical response of the joint.

The effect of contact on the decohesion of laminated beams with multiple microcracks

ZAVARISE, Giorgio
2008

Abstract

The problem of interface decohesion in laminated beams is addressed with reference to the debonding double cantilever beam test geometry (DCB). The paper deals with the analysis of the influence of nonuniform bonding properties or inter- facial defects on the crack propagation process and its stability. To this aim, the classical analytical approach based on the Euler–Bernoulli beam on an elastic foundation is extended to the presence of a general distribution of microcracks ahead of the macrocrack tip. The main features and limitations of this approach are carefully analyzed. In particular, it is shown that this simplified approach does not consider the unilateral contact condition along the interface, thus admitting a pen- etration between the two arms of the beam. A comparison with a finite element formulation is proposed to assess if this violation of the constraints inequalities, usually adopted in the case of uniform bonding, is still acceptable when interfacial defects are present. In order to fully describe the whole nonlinear behavior of the interface, a generalized interface consti- tutive law is used. The models comparison shows that, in the presence of interfacial defects, the effect of contact plays a crucial role in the description of the mechanical response of the joint.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11587/108301
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact