The article analyzes the original role of the Court of Cassation and focuses its attention on the legislative changes appeared in recent years. The author focuses on the rewriting of Art. 363 of the Code of civil procedure, that reinforces the nomophilactic role of the Suprem Court (“nomofilachia”), but, at the same time, imposes numerous interpretative issues. The author underlines the criticalities and then offers disenchanted observations de iure condito and de iure condendo.
La funzione nomofilattica per una (tendenzialmente unica e non soltanto) "uniforme interpretazione della legge"
Miccolis, Giuseppe
2021-01-01
Abstract
The article analyzes the original role of the Court of Cassation and focuses its attention on the legislative changes appeared in recent years. The author focuses on the rewriting of Art. 363 of the Code of civil procedure, that reinforces the nomophilactic role of the Suprem Court (“nomofilachia”), but, at the same time, imposes numerous interpretative issues. The author underlines the criticalities and then offers disenchanted observations de iure condito and de iure condendo.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
estratto MICCOLIS_Speciale_01_2021_DALFINO (1).pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
808.23 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
808.23 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
