Purpose: The axis of symmetry is the situation feature of axially-symmetric surfaces. Since it is a non-physical geometric entity, it is not directly measurable from the surface, but can nevertheless be derived from the surface. For discretised models, defined by point clouds or triangular meshes, the axis of symmetry detection is a very complex task to accomplish. In this paper three methods for axis estimation of high-density acquired axially-symmetric surfaces are reviewed and compared in the common cases. For each of these methods various versions have been considered which diversify each other for the criterion used for the normal estimation at the vertices of the tessellated model. Method: The methods for axis estimation are compared in the interpretation of the axes of axially-symmetric geometries (analytical and generic, partial and complete) for several types of discretization (size and regularity of the mesh). Result: The results show that in the case of complete axially-symmetric features (analytical or generic), the three analysed methods perform similar results. In presence of not complete axially-symmetric features the methods show very different performances. Discussion & Conclusion: The methods for axes estimation are of particular interest in several applications where precision and reliability are required. In this paper the main characteristics of the most important methods are identified and some guidelines for their use are given.

Comparison of methods for axis detection of high-density acquired axially-symmetric surfaces

A. E. Morabito;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: The axis of symmetry is the situation feature of axially-symmetric surfaces. Since it is a non-physical geometric entity, it is not directly measurable from the surface, but can nevertheless be derived from the surface. For discretised models, defined by point clouds or triangular meshes, the axis of symmetry detection is a very complex task to accomplish. In this paper three methods for axis estimation of high-density acquired axially-symmetric surfaces are reviewed and compared in the common cases. For each of these methods various versions have been considered which diversify each other for the criterion used for the normal estimation at the vertices of the tessellated model. Method: The methods for axis estimation are compared in the interpretation of the axes of axially-symmetric geometries (analytical and generic, partial and complete) for several types of discretization (size and regularity of the mesh). Result: The results show that in the case of complete axially-symmetric features (analytical or generic), the three analysed methods perform similar results. In presence of not complete axially-symmetric features the methods show very different performances. Discussion & Conclusion: The methods for axes estimation are of particular interest in several applications where precision and reliability are required. In this paper the main characteristics of the most important methods are identified and some guidelines for their use are given.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11587/372957
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact